Re-blogging this just for reference. The positions stated by Dr. Roots are unscientific–without rigorous metrics. Interesting to note the NPS signage.
By Roger Roots, J.D., Ph.D., Founder, Lysander Spooner University
www.lysanderspooneruniversity.com
Glacier National Park (GNP) straddles the continental divide along Montana’s border with Canada. Ever since Al Gore’s 2006 film, “An Inconvenient Truth,” the Park has been seen as ground zero in the international battle over manmade global warming. Almost every major figure promoting apocalyptic-manmade-global-warming-by-CO2 hysteria has made a publicized visit to the Park.
Today’s visitors to GNP are met with a steady stream of climate-change messaging. Official Park literature claims that all glaciers in GNP are predicted to melt away by the year 2030. (Some signs even tell visitors that the glaciers may be gone by 2020.)
A recurring trick by climate hysterics is to show an old photograph of one of GNP’s glaciers next to a more recent photo of the same glacier showing a massive decrease in size. Often the pictures do not precisely specify what…
View original post 337 more words
Climate Collections 
“(Some signs even tell visitors that the glaciers may be gone by 2020.)”
Best to quote them correctly.
The sign in the picture above actually says:
“Computer models indicate the glaciers WILL all be gone by the year 2020.” [My emphasis.]
That is the scare-mongers are telling the masses who drive through Glacier Park that it is a “scientific certainty” (WILL has a very strong connotation of future certainty. WILL is not MAY nor is it MIGHT).
They have 2 years until they’ll need to change their signs.
LikeLike
“They have 2 years until they’ll need to change their signs.”
Thanks Kent. Yes, precisely the reason for the post.
LikeLike